Media and Ethics (Liberal Society)
RAS Mains, Paper II, Unit I, point 3: "liberal society: transparency, media and bureaucracy" (this page covers media)
- Updated for the Jan 2026 syllabus
- Read time: about 11 minutes
Exam weight (our count from the real 2018-2024 papers)
0 questions with "media" in the title. It is a new line in the syllabus, so our guess is that it can appear in Part B or Part C (not RPSC information). Related law (RTI, IT Act) also sits in Paper III.
30-second summary
Remember
- In a liberal society a free media is the public's eye and the watchdog of power: it informs, exposes corruption and hosts debate.
- Freedom needs ethical discipline: truth, accuracy, fairness, a chance to reply, and respect for privacy.
- Constitutional base: the freedom in Article 19(1)(a) and the reasonable limits in Article 19(2).
- The administrator owes the media openness, accurate information and civil replies, but must not respond with pressure, bans or rumour.
- Rajasthan's 2017 ordinance and bill (a clash of media freedom, bureaucracy and accountability) is a live example.
Part A box (each line 15 words or fewer)
Remember
- Question: What is the main role of the media in a liberal society?
- Answer: The media informs citizens, hosts public debate and makes those in power answerable. (13 words)
- Ready line 2: Media ethics means truth, accuracy, fairness, a chance to reply, and respect for privacy. (14 words)
- Ready line 3: Trial by media means the press declaring an accused guilty before the court decides. (14 words)
1. Liberal society and the media
A liberal society rests on individual liberty, rule of law and limited, answerable power. A free media keeps these alive: it informs the public, airs criticism of power and provides an open forum for views.
J.S. Mill (On Liberty, 1859): suppressing opinion risks suppressing truth. His well-known line: "If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion... mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind." (Source: Wikipedia, "On Liberty".)
2. Four roles of the media
(a) informing; (b) watching power (investigative reporting); (c) forum for public debate; (d) bridge between citizen and State. The 2nd ARC (Fourth Report, January 2007, para 5.3.1) says a free media has a crucial role in the prevention, monitoring and control of corruption.
3. Ethical challenges
(our list, as points to think with)
Publishing unverified allegations in the rush of competition (2nd ARC, para 5.3.3: under competitive pressure the media sometimes does not verify allegations before publishing, and some allegations are motivated).
Trial by media, intrusion on privacy, sensationalism.
Paid or one-sided coverage; ownership and advertiser pressure.
Misinformation and rumour spreading on social media.
Gandhi's view: "the sole aim of journalism should be service... an uncontrolled pen serves but to destroy"; control from without is more poisonous, and only control from within is profitable (An Autobiography; the English text is in the quotes box).
4. Legal and institutional frame
Article 19(1)(a) and 19(2): freedom of speech and its reasonable limits. In Romesh Thappar v State of Madras (26 May 1950) the Supreme Court struck down the ban on the circulation of the journal Cross Roads under the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949, holding freedom of circulation an indispensable part of freedom of publication. The First Amendment (1951) then added "public order" to the grounds in Article 19(2). Source: a summary of the judgment (AIR 1950 SC 124).
Shreya Singhal v Union of India (24 March 2015): Section 66A of the IT Act was struck down as vague and over-broad, with a "chilling effect" on free speech; the blocking process under Section 69A was upheld. Source: Wikipedia.
Press Council of India: first set up in 1966 (under the Press Council Act, 1965), dissolved during the Emergency, and reconstituted in 1979 under the Press Council Act, 1978. Its aim is to preserve press freedom and improve the standards of newspapers and news agencies; it issued the "Norms of Journalistic Conduct". It can warn, admonish, censure or disapprove, but cannot penalise. Source: Wikipedia.
2nd ARC remark (2007): the Press Council had a code of conduct for print media but no such code existed for electronic media (para 5.3.4, the position in 2007; today's position may differ, so write "in 2007").
5. Officer and media
Conduct Rule 8 (connection with press or other media): no government servant may, without previous government sanction, own, edit or manage a newspaper or other periodical or electronic media; when taking part in public media they must make clear that the views are their own, not the Government's. (Publishing a book or taking part in public media in the bona fide discharge of official duties is not barred.) The Rajasthan Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1971 have matching rules: Rule 10 (connection with the press or radio) and Rule 11 (criticism of Government); headings follow the official Rajasthan Government PDF.
Rule 9 (criticism of Government): no statement of fact or opinion, in the press, broadcast or public utterance, that adversely criticises a current or recent policy or action of the Central or a State Government; statements made in an official capacity or in the due performance of duties are excluded.
The officer's positive duty: give accurate, timely information; be courteous to those seeking it; reply to allegations with facts. The 2nd ARC (para 5.3.2) said authorities should respond immediately to media reports of corruption, appraise the facts, act, and keep the press and public informed; and (para 5.3.3) the person accused should get a fair chance to put forward their version.
6. Balance
press freedom and personal dignity, public interest and privacy, the right to information and the secrecy of an investigation. Tests: is there a public interest? were the facts checked? was the other side heard?
Worked examples (documented, with year)
Romesh Thappar (26 May 1950)
and Shreya Singhal (24 March 2015): the first for freedom of the press to circulate, the second for freedom of expression online.
Conduct Rules 8 and 9.
a direct example of the limits on an officer's own dealings with the media.
How to use in an answer
role in a liberal society (Mill or ARC 5.3.1), then ethical challenges (ARC 5.3.3, Gandhi), then the legal base (Article 19, Romesh Thappar, Press Council), then the Rajasthan 2017 example, then a balanced close.
Thinkers and quotes box
| Name | Idea | Usable line |
|---|---|---|
| Mahatma Gandhi | Journalism as service | "...the sole aim of journalism should be service... an uncontrolled pen serves but to destroy." (An Autobiography; page numbers differ by edition) |
| J.S. Mill (1859) | Do not silence opinion | "If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion... mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person..." (On Liberty, chapter 2) |
| Louis Brandeis (1913) | Publicity cleanses | "Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." |
Diagram: 2x2 with a balance test
Media freedom (low / high)
Two axes: horizontal ; vertical
Media responsibility (low / high)
Low freedom, high responsibility: a timid press
Four boxes: / / /
High freedom, low responsibility: rumour and trial by media
Low, low: suppression
High, high: the target state of a liberal society
Public interest? Facts checked? Other side heard?
Three tests in the centre
No question titled "media" was found in the 2018, 2021, 2023 or 2024 Paper II. This count covers all 52 Unit I questions of 2018, 2021, 2023 and 2024; it is not RPSC information.
Nearest: the 2018 and 2024 questions on pages 3.3 and 3.4 deal with the relation of power and administration; the media is the third angle of that relation.
Preparation advice: a Part B on "media scrutiny: help or harm", or a Part C on "media and bureaucracy in a liberal society". This is our guess.
Common mistakes
Remember
- Writing the media only as "good watchdog" or only as "factory of sensation"; give both sides.
- Quoting Article 19(1)(a) but dropping the limits of 19(2).
- Presenting the 2007 ARC remark (no code for electronic media) as today's position.
Self-check (5 questions)
Remember
- Name two roles of the media in a liberal society.
- What did Romesh Thappar (1950) hold?
- What can the Press Council do, and what can it not do?
- What do Conduct Rules 8 and 9 say?
- What was the main point of the Rajasthan 2017 bill, and what happened to it?
Case studyRajasthan, 2017-2018
on 6 September 2017 the Governor promulgated the Criminal Laws (Rajasthan Amendment) Ordinance, 2017; a bill on the same lines was tabled in October 2017. It would have barred courts from proceeding against serving and former judges, magistrates and public servants without government sanction, and barred the media from naming them until sanction was given. After protests the bill went to a Select Committee, and on 19 February 2018 the Chief Minister announced its withdrawal (the ordinance had already lapsed on 4 December 2017).
- Source
- Scroll report (The Wire confirms the sequence).
Lesson
accountability against shielding of officials, and the freedom of the media.
Mini case study
Illustrative exampleHypothetical case (काल्पनिक केस)
A local news portal in District Collector Nandini's district runs a video story claiming that a ration shop is under-weighing grain and that her department ignored complaints. One part of the story is true; the figures are inflated. Her media cell advises, "Get the portal blocked and file a case." The video is spreading on social media.
- Stakeholders
- Nandini, the portal's journalist, the ration-shop owner, consumers, the department and the District Supply Officer, the public, the state government.
- Issue and clashing values
- press freedom, transparency and accountability against the department's image; fairness and fact against the damage a half-truth can do.
- Three options
- (a) Get the portal blocked and sue. Pro: instant "control". Con: a blow to press freedom, an accusation that she is suppressing the true part, and the story grows. (b) Stay silent. Pro: no clash. Con: rumour spreads, consumers suffer, trust in the department falls. (c) Order a quick inquiry, admit the true part and announce action; send a factual clarification with documents on the wrong figures and ask the portal to publish it; use the Press Council or legal route only if malice is shown. Pro: truth, transparency and press freedom all protected. Con: the inquiry takes time and she must take the criticism.
- Best option and supporting value
- option (c). Values: transparency, accountability and respect for press freedom; the 2nd ARC's guidance (paras 5.3.2 and 5.3.3) of prompt action on reports, checking facts and giving everyone a chance to put their side.
Lesson
Action: Short term: inquiry within 24 hours, a fact sheet issued, action against the ration shop, a complaint helpline for consumers. Long term: proactive disclosure of ration-shop lists and stock, social audit, and a clear protocol for media interaction in the department.
Practice Questions
Practice questionabout 50 words
Is media scrutiny a help or a harm to administration? Answer in two points.
Model answer
Help: investigative reports expose corruption and raise accountability, as the 2nd ARC recognised. Harm: unverified allegations, trial by media and sensationalism can damage officers' reputations and decisions. The remedy is to keep press freedom intact while insisting on verification, a chance to reply and a code of ethics.
Practice questionabout 100 words
Examine the role and limits of the media in a liberal society, and say how the bureaucracy should relate to it.
Model answer
In a liberal society the media informs citizens and makes power answerable; Article 19(1)(a) is its base, and Romesh Thappar (1950) treated freedom of circulation as part of it. Yet unverified allegations, trial by media and misinformation are real problems, which is why the Press Council has a code. The bureaucracy should offer accurate information, timely replies and openness, never a road to muzzle the press; Rajasthan's 2017 bill, withdrawn in 2018, is the warning. The balance is freedom, verification and a fair chance to reply. Neither suppression nor sensation serves the public; both fail the test of public interest.
How to Write This Answer
Introduction
media in a liberal society
Body
- roles, challenges, legal base, officer's conduct
Conclusion
freedom + responsibility
Value addition
- Mill, Gandhi, Brandeis
One-page Revision
- Liberal society: liberty + rule of law + answerable power
- four roles (inform, watch, debate, bridge)
- ARC 5.3.1 (role in curbing corruption), 5.3.2 (prompt action), 5.3.3 (verify, hear the other side)
- Articles 19(1)(a), 19(2)
- Romesh Thappar 26.5.1950
- Shreya Singhal 24.3.2015 (66A struck down)
- Press Council 1966, Act 1978, reconstituted 1979
- Conduct Rules 8, 9
- Mill 1859
- Gandhi, Autobiography (service)
- Rajasthan: ordinance 6.9.2017, bill Oct 2017, withdrawal 19.2.2018
- Case: Collector Nandini, inquiry + fact sheet + right of reply.